Back to all news
Business → Food & Beverage → Regulations6 Aug 2026· 5 hours ago

That 7-Year-Old Rum in Your Glass Might Be Barely Aged At All — FSSAI Just Pulled the Curtain Back

by Startup Unplugged4 min read
That 7-Year-Old Rum in Your Glass Might Be Barely Aged At All — FSSAI Just Pulled the Curtain Back
Photo · Editorial

There's something almost funny about the idea of a whisky needing help tasting like whisky. But that's essentially what India's food safety regulator just accused several big spirits makers of doing, and it wasn't laughing when it handed down the order.

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India has suspended sales of select brands from Diageo's United Spirits, Inbrew Beverages, and Old Monk maker Mohan Rocky Springwater, after finding they were dosing their whiskies and rums with artificial or nature-identical flavourings not disclosed to buyers. The list includes recognisable names like Royal Challenge Whisky, Antiquity Blue Whisky, Bagpiper Deluxe Whisky, Old Cask Deluxe XXX Rum, and three versions of Old Monk itself.

Here's the part that actually raises eyebrows. FSSAI isn't against flavouring in principle, it's legal when there's a genuine technical reason. What it objects to is flavouring designed specifically to mimic the taste a properly aged spirit would naturally develop, essentially faking the flavour of time and process. In one case the regulator examined, a rum marketed as a "7-year-old blended" product turned out to contain less than 5 percent aged rum, with more than 75 percent being neutral, unaged spirit filled out by flavouring instead of actual ageing.

That, regulators say, lets companies skip the slow, expensive parts of production, real molasses, malt, grapes, years of maturation, while still selling the finished bottle as though none of that was skipped. The products in question were officially labelled sub-standard for containing external flavourings not declared clearly on packaging.

FSSAI has been on something of a labelling crackdown lately, having recently told energy drink makers like PepsiCo and Red Bull to drop the term "energy drink" entirely, a request the companies pushed back on, unsuccessfully. This time, the regulator did leave a door open: some manufacturers can keep selling existing stock, but only if the front label honestly states what's actually in the bottle, and only if they stop using the flavouring going forward.


Filed by

Startup Unplugged

Keep reading.

All news